 EU & UK Policy Developments
Over the next few years several specific national rural policy changes will
be taking effect. We will work to ensure that these do not compromise but, where
possible, benefit moorland areas:
Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy could help reduce the incentive for
overgrazing by sheep and encouraging more mixed and extensive grazing patterns.
However, there is a risk that undergrazing could become a new problem and that
vital traditional labour skills and remote moorland communities will be lost.
We will lobby for agri-environment incentives to be aimed at re-establishing
areas of heather which have been grazed out over the last 50 years, and to expand
moorland habitat and wildlife
Open Access to moorlands will help in some areas by bringing in new income
but, if not properly implemented and funded, could lead to conflict with people
who earn their livelihoods form moorlands. There could also be a negative impact
on ground nesting birds, particularly if rules on control of dogs are not properly
enforced. There must also be a watertight system of informing access users about
permitted closures of moorlands under the 28-day rule. We will work with access
authorities to identify and resolve problems
Moorland owners face increasing restrictions on their freedom to manage, due
to conservation designations and bureaucracy. While many of these are in line
with good practice, some have not been scientifically proven to be necessary
for instance reduced heather burning on SSSI sites. We will monitor these
cases and lobby for flexible guidelines based on local conditions, rather than
blanket national prescriptions.
The EU Water Framework Directive will have an impact on moorlands as they are
an important element in water collection and carbon sequestration, and there
may be pressure for changes in heather management, for instance reversion to
scrub woodland. We will closely monitor the research and test any proposals
against scientific evidence
Other Key Challenges
Raptors and biodiversity: the conflict between raptors and other
birds has the potential to set back biodiversity across large areas of moorland.
But the issue is capable of being resolved if a pragmatic approach to achieving
a practical balance is taken by Government agencies. We will continue to lobby
for this and to this end will collaborate work with all the other stakeholder
organisations involved.
 Anti-shooting sentiment: the rise of anti-shooting campaigning
groups and zealots, and the increasing interference by politicians in the ethics
of shooting, is a longer-term threat to the sustainability of moorlands where
grouse shooting is a key land-use. We will continue to make the strong argument
that grouse management is highly beneficial to moorland biodiversity, with the
conclusive scientific proof that exists and is currently being undertaken, and
that any chipping away at the ability to run well-managed grouse shooting will
be harmful both to the landscape aesthetics and the wildlife diversity of moorlands.
|